Tag Archives: Timbs v. Indiana
Dobbs Sentences #168: Part II D 1
Paragraph 2 of 3 Sentence 2 of 3 The next sentence is a single claim that merits close examination: “We have held that the ‘established method of substantive-due-process analysis’ requires that an unenumerated right be ‘“deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition”’ before it can be recognized as a component of the ‘liberty’ protected […]
Dobbs: Ordered Liberty #1
So far I’ve looked at all of the sentences in Part II section A 1 & 2 and quickly assessed whether the claims in those sentences can be determined true. I came up with many true claims and even more undetermined claims (with one of those likely false). One of the factors preventing me from […]
Dobbs Sentences #30: Part II A 2
Paragraph 6 of 9 Sentence 1 of 2 The first sentence of the next paragraph contains two claims: “Timbs and McDonald concerned the question whether the Fourteenth Amendment protects rights that are expressly set out in the Bill of Rights, and it would be anomalous if similar historical support were not required when a putative […]
Dobbs Sentences #26: Part II A 2
Paragraph 4 of 9 Sentence 2 of 2 The next sentence is only one claim, but it contains a number of elements: “In concluding that the Eighth Amendment’s protection against excessive fines is “fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty” and “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,” 586 U. S., at ___ (slip […]
Dobbs Sentences #25: Part II A 2
Paragraph 4 of 9 Sentence 1 of 2 The opening sentence of the next paragraph contains a single claim: “Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court in Timbs is a recent example.” Without getting into the content of Ginsburg’s opinion, the facts of this claim are pretty easy to establish. Timbs was decided in 2019, and […]
Cynical Jason 