As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.

Paragraph 3 of 3

Sentence 2 of 4

Two claims in this sentence:

“The dissent, by contrast, would impose on the people a particular theory about when the rights of personhood begin.”

The claims:

• “The dissent [. . .] would impose on the people a particular theory about when the rights of personhood begin.”
• This is in contrast with the majority’s opinion.

Both of these will rely on a complete reading of the dissent, so they will have to remain undetermined:

• “The dissent [. . .] would impose on the people a particular theory about when the rights of personhood begin.”
• This is in contrast with the majority’s opinion.