As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.

Paragraph 3 of 3

Sentence 4 of 4

This sentence contains at least three claims:

“There are occasions when past decisions should be overruled, and as we will explain, this is one of them.”

The claims:

• “There are occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”
• “[W]e will explain” that “this is one of” the “occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”
• “[T]his is one of” the “occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”

I’m positive that the first claim can’t be quickly confirmed, and the other two look to be expanded on in the near future, so all three of these are undetermined for now:

• “There are occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”
• “[W]e will explain” that “this is one of” the “occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”
• “[T]his is one of” the “occasions when past decisions should be overruled.”