As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.

Paragraph 2 of 3

Sentence 1 of 2

I count two claims here:

“The largely limitless reach of the dissenters’ standard is illustrated by the way they apply it here.”

The claims:

• “The dissenters’ standard” has “largely limitless reach.”
• “The largely limitless reach of the dissenters’ standard is illustrated by the way they apply it here.”

These need to be supported, so until I see that support these are undetermined:

• “The dissenters’ standard” has “largely limitless reach.”
• “The largely limitless reach of the dissenters’ standard is illustrated by the way they apply it here.”