As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.

Paragraph 4 of 6

Sentence 4 of 6

This sentence is another simple claim:

“In some States, voters may believe that the abortion right should be even more extensive than the right that Roe and Casey recognized.”

Again, this claim is undoubtedly true, but my questions from the previous sentence remain: people will have different ideas at every level down to the individual person. But this also brings up the issue I broached a few sentences ago: to what extent are we required to take belief seriously? There are some things we can know and other things we can’t, and the space in between will rely on belief, but how do we go about ranking those beliefs or concerns to conform with some idea of “ordered liberty?”

True claim:

• “In some States, voters may believe that the abortion right should be even more extensive than the right that Roe and Casey recognized.”