As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.

Paragraph 1 of 6

Sentence 2 of 2

The first sentence of Part II C 1 contains two claims:

“Instead of seriously pressing the argument that the abortion right itself has deep roots, supporters of Roe and Casey contend that the abortion right is an integral part of a broader entrenched right.”

Here are the two claims:

• “[S]upporters of Roe and Casey” do not “press[] the argument that the abortion right itself has deep roots.”
• “[S]upporters of Roe and Casey contend that the abortion right is an integral part of a broader entrenched right.”

It’s not difficult to imagine that both of these are true, and I’m inclined to assume they are. But since I’m only marking true what is established as true, and the support for these claims will follow, I’m calling them both undetermined:

• “[S]upporters of Roe and Casey” do not “press[] the argument that the abortion right itself has deep roots.”
• “[S]upporters of Roe and Casey contend that the abortion right is an integral part of a broader entrenched right.”