As always, you can find the Dobbs v. Jackson decision here.
Paragraph 10 of 11
Sentence 1 of 2
One claim in this sentence:
“There is ample evidence that the passage of these laws was instead spurred by a sincere belief that abortion kills a human being.”
That’s a motive, too, right? Certainly held by some—maybe even most—but it would be irresponsible to ascribe it to all of them, right?
I’m being unfair again. Absent a definition of “ample,” there’s nothing here that can be verified or falsified, so we’ll just have to see what comes next. I hope there’s some support coming, but for now this is undetermined:
- “There is ample evidence that the passage of these laws was instead spurred by a sincere belief that abortion kills a human being.”
